From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <1055b16f0609260656s19f76611q6669a39b1b28ff0c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 09:56:11 -0400
From: "Artem Letko" <aletko@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] linux il/ip
In-Reply-To: <76b4a303fc6e2bad8f571e9e9b1cee95@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4518EE05.60007@Utel.no>
	<76b4a303fc6e2bad8f571e9e9b1cee95@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c20a2e3a-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/26/06, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> also it has extra cruft like mtu discovery and multihoming
> of both source and destination.  this means that sctp is ~29kloc
> and tcp is 14kloc of code in the linux kernel.  but sctp doesn't
> have connections.
>

not true again: mtu discovery is a standard practice. is traceroute a
cruft? than mtu discovery is too.

> il in plan 9 is ~1kloc. so i think my parody is still apt.
>
> - erik
>

-art