From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: [9fans] book chapters
From: Jack Johnson <fragment@nas.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
In-Reply-To: <85e39b08c2610d853d7e85a323d2ab46@collyer.net>
References: <85e39b08c2610d853d7e85a323d2ab46@collyer.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1056909326.2840.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 10:55:26 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e0e8cf56-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 15:12, geoff@collyer.net wrote:
> I wonder if the people who rave about ACLs are actually attached to
> some aspect of a particular implementation

I'm not necessarily attached to ACLs, but the "everybody but Bob" case
is a standard scenario not easily handled by groups.

For instance, you have a set of people whose files you want readable by
their supervisors, but not by their peers.

If you have a handy group solution for this, I'm all for enlightenment.

-Jack