From: Dave Lukes <davel@anvil.com>
To: 9fans <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: SMTP+SPF (was: [9fans] Re: new release?)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:43:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1077817415.3851.136.camel@zevon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040226104154.GL66917@cassie.foobarbaz.net>
> that said, i agree that spf seems a bit of a hack. but
> i don't disagree with presotto trying to add support.
> why?
> because it provides more options.
Oh, goody! Just what the world needs: more non-working options.
> policy should be left up to the admin.
I _am_ the admin, in this case (I'm an SA in the Real World),
and my policy is: I don't want crap that doesn't help me.
I can kill most spam with spamassassin,
so unless spf kills _all_ spam, who cares?
> i am definitely interested to see what geoff has in
> store; it'd be great to put the work of authentication
> and verification on the sender.
Amen.
> until then, let's provide
> as many options as folks writing the code are willing
> to support.
... and as many buffer overflows as you don't want.
:-(
Dave (who's battling sendmail and named at the moment).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 18:31 [9fans] Re: new release? chris niewiarowski
2004-02-25 18:59 ` matt
2004-02-26 6:09 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-25 20:34 ` ron minnich
2004-02-25 20:43 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 20:53 ` ron minnich
2004-02-25 20:59 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 21:10 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-25 21:13 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 21:45 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-25 21:55 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 22:39 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 4:36 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-25 22:41 ` 9nut
2004-02-25 22:47 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 23:03 ` David Presotto
2004-02-25 23:50 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 0:14 ` SMTP+SPF (was: [9fans] Re: new release?) Joel Salomon
2004-02-26 0:42 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 9:25 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 13:48 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 1:09 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 9:28 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 10:41 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-26 17:43 ` Dave Lukes [this message]
2004-02-26 20:03 ` Christopher Nielsen
2004-02-26 21:46 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 22:01 ` Geoff Collyer
[not found] ` <1077840327.5034.5.camel@rea>
2004-02-27 0:08 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-27 0:18 ` C H Forsyth
2004-02-27 0:15 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-28 16:17 ` vdharani
2004-02-26 1:25 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 2:12 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 1:50 ` andrey mirtchovski
2004-02-26 2:51 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 6:45 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 8:06 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-26 8:06 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 8:14 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 8:20 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 12:30 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-26 12:35 ` Charles Forsyth
2004-02-26 14:42 ` ron minnich
2004-02-26 14:15 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 13:21 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 14:46 ` George Michaelson
2004-02-26 15:09 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 21:12 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 3:42 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 4:36 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 4:50 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 6:51 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 11:27 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 10:39 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 11:58 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-26 11:16 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 11:24 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 12:37 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-26 1:36 ` [9fans] Re: new release? Derek Fawcus
2004-02-26 1:44 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 3:49 ` Geoff Collyer
2004-02-25 23:29 ` Dave Lukes
2004-02-25 23:59 ` 9nut
2004-02-25 21:25 ` David Presotto
2004-02-26 0:56 ` Brantley Coile
2004-02-25 21:35 ` matt
2004-02-25 22:39 ` 9nut
2004-02-25 22:00 ` Scott Schwartz
2004-02-25 22:05 ` David Tolpin
2004-02-25 22:39 ` Scott Schwartz
2004-02-26 6:26 ` boyd, rounin
2004-02-26 18:48 ` rog
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1077817415.3851.136.camel@zevon \
--to=davel@anvil.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).