From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [9fans] imap4d and Outlook From: Dave Lukes To: Lucio De Re Cc: 9fans <9fans@cse.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040229194337.A29577@cackle.proxima.alt.za> References: <20040229194337.A29577@cackle.proxima.alt.za> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1078077689.18041.30.camel@rea> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:01:29 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0499137e-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 L, If you can wait until tomorrow morning, I can at least save you wasting a barf-bag: I've been Poking at Post-offices with Python for the previous few weeks, so it won't take me long to find the answer. IIRC, it's RFC822-like, so it'll have all sorts of evil muck like timezone offsets in it. Dave. On Sun, 2004-02-29 at 17:43, Lucio De Re wrote: > It seems to me that imap4d and Outlook disagree on the interpretation > of dates. As displayed, the year and day are interchanged. > > The fact that changing the date representation in the regional > settings (NT-4, Settings/Regional Settings/Date) causes Outlook to > crash rather dramatically (maybe it can't cope with the representation > of an inverted date) does nothing to reassure me that the problem > is in imap4d. > > But it doesn't hurt to ask. I have very little intention of reading > the IMAP RFCs, if you'll forgive me. > > ++L > > PS: If it helps, I _can_ try Mozilla's mailer as comparison, but > not immediately.