From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 05:20:52 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <107d0215fe4f7795e74828c52a8f35ed@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAM8pOuOtwTFjJDPYo_K3L580Zv-W24_XU-ZiBjP-6p9SFkHNkA@mail.gmail.c>
References: <4b4cb03e4e9ec2f1608afb247217d327@rei2.9hal>
	<972f40a7e71fb246f34c5685f786d059@sp.inri.net>
	<CAM8pOuMnp3xPw58g-7a7O_3HhOqf9=Z=DP-XfaGXQJdWyzrVFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM8pOuOtwTFjJDPYo_K3L580Zv-W24_XU-ZiBjP-6p9SFkHNkA@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 'no fat' - boot failure
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8c63fc24-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Here's some relevant output of linux dmesg regarding MP on my machine:
[...]
> [    0.000000] Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information

i think this is the salient bit.  linux is not using the mp tables.  it's using acpi.

- erik