From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: [9fans] telnet
From: Dave Lukes <davel@anvil.com>
To: 9fans <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <F12504DC.108D44FA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6539032d477448b0012d3f61ba04e24f@collyer.net>
	 <058401c42a4d$5515ffd0$48db7d50@SOMA>  <F12504DC.108D44FA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <1082922524.18676.6.camel@rea>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:48:44 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6c10bf3e-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 04:35, Russ Cox wrote:
> > i have to disagree.  the ! addressing no different from / [file]
> > addressing.  you can synthesise the file tree based on context.

I have to disagree with the disagreement:
in this context
	Context = RandomRFCMush * random_practice_on_the_internet

Now, if someone wants to write a file server that understands
the minds of the creators, high priests and supplicants of that
ginormous tin god DeeEnEss, then good luck to them.

I look forward eagerly to the skeleton design spec,
due early next millennium.

> cd /net/name/usa/edu; ls

Amen.
	Dave.