From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1094.24.6.25.223.1111878231.squirrel@www.infernopark.com> In-Reply-To: <20050326083629.GH93332@smp500.sitetronics.com> References: <26029ec71211f29300ddd8b5225f1e38@coraid.com><20050325183606.GA93332@smp500.sitetronics.com><20050325200401.GB93332@smp500.sitetronics.com><20050325202349.GD93332@smp500.sitetronics.com><20050326083044.GG93332@smp500.sitetronics.com> <20050326083629.GH93332@smp500.sitetronics.com> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 17:03:50 -0600 Subject: Re: [9fans] Kernel interface manpages From: vdharani@infernopark.com To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2c2fb71e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > Ok, so spawning from my recent questions from the list, it > appears that we'd probably benefit from some concise, well > written man pages for kernel interfaces. I know Inferno has > (some of?) these, but as with addclock0link, ours does differ. > > I'd be willing to write some extra man pages for kernel > interfaces. What'd be the best way to go about doing this? > Simply read through the {port}fns.h and write? > given that most functions are similar to inferno, may be the ideal thing to do is to simply copy the current inferno man pages and go from there. not sure if license is an issue. thanks dharani