From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Wed,  3 Feb 2010 14:25:34 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <10ee2c6fd7c18f9ca27f47c72c10bd76@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <a560a5d01002031056m720e3844y33fa2f1d1dc4c607@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a560a5d01002031056m720e3844y33fa2f1d1dc4c607@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] fgb/abaco vs quanstro/abaco
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc74681e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>
> What's the difference between fgb/abaco vs quanstro/abaco?
> Are there any differences in used fonts? (I use fgb's and letters are
> not so nice; I don't know much about fonts, though...)
>
> Is there a simple way of trying out both? (They have the same name, so
> I guess I can't just contrib/install both...)

fonts are the main difference.  you can run abaco from
sources directly without installing, of course.  something
like (untested, since i have the fonts installed)

	9fs sources
	s = /n/sources/contrib/quanstro/root
	bind -a $s/lib/font/bit /lib/font/bit
	if(! test -f /mnt/webfs/ctl)
		webfs
	$s/386/bin/abaco 9fans.net/archive

- erik