From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Brian L. Stuart" <blstuart@bellsouth.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:05:59 +0000
Message-Id: <112020082105.1433.4925D13700093DA20000059922230682229B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9B9D0E9A9B9C040D@att.net>
In-Reply-To: <3e5c68888a22062ee294de5df8f7c4b4@9srv.net>
References: <112020081923.14554.4925B93400098179000038DA22230703729B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9B9D0E9A9B9C040D@att.net>
	<3e5c68888a22062ee294de5df8f7c4b4@9srv.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 != Inferno... right?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4cbd7440-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I think a more precise way of saying it is that in 9p2000 and
> the new styx, authentication has been moved outside the
> protocol proper. styx==9p now; the names are used by
> convention to imply the auth method, if any.

You're right.  I stand corrected.  For some reason I
had thought that the Tauth message was different,
but I see that in both man pages it just carries
the afid obtained by an exchange not specified by
the protocol.

BLS