From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri,  4 Nov 2005 07:58:56 +0100
From: "Nils O. =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sel=E5sdal?=" <NOS@Utel.no>
Subject: Re: [9fans] tab completion and command history in rc
In-reply-to: <000001c5e0e1$76791f80$14aaa8c0@utelsystems.local>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Message-id: <1131087536.12398.7.camel@nos-rh.utelsystems.local>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <71838305-CDB2-4CE6-87C5-8EFAA3E03FD1@mit.edu>
	<436AB5F5.8050703@moseslake-wa.com>
	<20051104012235.GE28449@server4.lensbuddy.com>
	<000001c5e0e1$76791f80$14aaa8c0@utelsystems.local>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a52a936e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 02:45 +0100, Uriel wrote:
> One last note: one of the reasons why tab-completion is frowned upon is
> because it's indication of too intricate paths, remember to keep your
> file trees clean and simple and to take advantage of binds and union
> mounts to keep everything at hand. If you do this you won't miss
> tab-completion and you will have a much easier time finding what you are
> looking for.

Even all simple paths arn't remembered, and it may still fewer
keystrokes.