From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri,  4 May 2007 21:47:15 -0700
From: Roman Shaposhnick <rvs@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] speaking of kenc
In-reply-to: <pLadnc922t8RLafbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Message-id: <1178340435.8179.15.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <32d987d50705022111s70dacb4i199ad059cdb610@mail.gmail.com>
	<1178243111.16650.1826.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com>
	<pLadnc922t8RLafbnZ2dnUVZ_i2dnZ2d@comcast.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5a7e40c0-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 08:46 +0000, Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:
> "Roman Shaposhnick" <rvs@sun.com> wrote in message 
> news:1178243111.16650.1826.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com...
> > P.S. Here at Sun I've been putting some of the GCC extensions
> > into Sun Studio, ...
> 
> Here's hoping you require a command-line flag to enable them.
 
  Of course!

> As someone else noted, one way to check for many instances of
> GCC-dependency in a mass of source code is to use a compiler
> that *doesn't* support for the myriad GCC features.  Some of
> the current Linux programmers have no idea when they have
> used GCC-specific features (usually quite unnecessarily).

  True.

Thanks,
Roman.