From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <1179.199.98.17.55.1064843635.squirrel@wish>
In-Reply-To: <023c99744feab1c9acd4105cd498c549@sdgm.net>
References: <2896.67.31.14.208.1064805819.squirrel@wish.cooper.edu>
     <023c99744feab1c9acd4105cd498c549@sdgm.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have limits
From: "Joel Salomon" <salomo3@cooper.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:53:55 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 557d092c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025


boyd@sdgm.net said:
> effective, but no 'stand off' range.
>
that's for the bagpipe to do.

--Joel