From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 15:58:53 -0700
From: Roman Shaposhnick <rvs@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Multimedia on Plan 9
In-reply-to: <50ffb060d0e6fe7eaf82a7bc15c68424@coraid.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Message-id: <1182553133.25089.398.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <50ffb060d0e6fe7eaf82a7bc15c68424@coraid.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 85b9c48a-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 17:07 -0400, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >   Although Plan9 file model, as nice as it is breaks horribly when
> > we start talking about HD multimedia content. The performance bottleneck
> > is quite noticeable at 50MBpbs :-(
>
> 50 MB/s == 1 gigabit
> i think this will be a problem as soon as there exist gigabit link to actual
> content providers.

  Sorry for the garbled 'MBpbs' junk (tired fingers on a keyboard which
is waaaay smaller than I usually use). Of course I meant Mbits per
second. And that's now the norm in HD media.

Thanks,
Roman.