From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 and multicores/parallelism/concurrency?
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 09:31:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216053072.22701.28.camel@goose.sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <140e7ec30807140208u78f7299dq85b6238ad33f8976@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 17:08 +0800, sqweek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:45 PM, ssecorp <circularfunc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > from wikipedia:
> > "Plan 9 from Bell Labs is a distributed operating system, primarily
> > used for research."
> >
> > but it doesnt say anything more about the distributed part.
> >
> > In what way does it make it easy?
>
> Plan 9 makes it easy via 9p, its file system/resource sharing
> protocol. In plan 9, things like graphics and network drivers export a
> 9p interface (a filetree). Furthermore, 9p is network transparent
> which means accesses to remote resources look exactly like accesses to
> local resources, and this is the main trick - processes do not care
> whether the file they are interested in is being served by the kernel,
> a userspace process, or a machine half way across the world.
All very true. And it sure does provide enormous benefits on distributed
memory architectures. But do you know of any part that would be
beneficial for highly-SMP systems?
Thanks,
Roman.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-14 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-14 8:45 ssecorp
2008-07-14 9:08 ` sqweek
2008-07-14 16:17 ` Iruata Souza
2008-07-14 16:31 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik [this message]
2008-07-14 10:15 ` a
2008-07-14 15:32 ` David Leimbach
2008-07-14 16:00 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-14 16:29 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-07-14 20:08 ` a
2008-07-14 20:39 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-07-14 22:12 ` a
2008-07-17 12:26 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-07-17 12:40 ` erik quanstrom
2008-07-17 13:00 ` ron minnich
2008-07-14 20:43 ` Charles Forsyth
2008-07-14 16:35 erik quanstrom
[not found] <f1209aefaab5eece7465c3d0df545ddd@quanstro.net>
2008-07-14 20:33 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-07-15 1:37 ` Joel C. Salomon
2008-07-15 8:01 ` Bakul Shah
2008-07-15 17:50 ` Paul Lalonde
2008-07-17 19:29 ` Bakul Shah
2008-07-18 3:31 ` Paul Lalonde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216053072.22701.28.camel@goose.sun.com \
--to=rvs@sun.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).