From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] mounting stdin using 9pfuse
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:46:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1223264804.6352.33.camel@goose.sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <140e7ec30810050835jdf02297g4a89eadf103826f0@mail.gmail.com>
Hi!
Thanks for replying. You're the only one so far, which makes
me wonder whether there's a more appropriate place for
plan9port discussions.
On Sun, 2008-10-05 at 23:35 +0800, sqweek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 3:18 AM, Roman V. Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com> wrote:
> > it appears that I'm missing something fundamental in how
> > 9pfuse (the one written by Russ) works when it is given
> > "-" as an address.
>
> Seems to work here on linux after:
> #include <error.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
>
> void socket012(int fd)
> {
> int i;
> - for (i=0; i<3; i++) {
> + for (i=0; i<2; i++) {
> close(i);
> dup2(fd, i);
>
> if (fork()) {
> socket012(fd[0]);
> - execlp("9pfuse", "9pfuse", "-", "/tmp/fuse", (char*)0);
> + execlp("9pfuse", "9pfuse", "-D", "-", "/tmp/fuse", (char*)0);
> } else {
> socket012(fd[1]);
>
> ls -l caused a failed assertion in ramfs, but it was going.
Yeah, that tripped me too. In fact, I'm wondering whether ramfs works
as advertised at all. I wasn't able to make it work on:
$ uname -a
Linux goose 2.6.22.17-0.1-default #1 SMP 2008/02/10 20:01:04 UTC x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> Can't justify why the diff works, but before adding -D and changing 3 -> 2 I
> didn't have any success.
It seems to be flaky on my end. It looks like a race condition but
I haven't investigated further yet.
> Would love to look into it further but in the
> interest of not destroying my work schedule this week I'm going to get
> some damn sleep. Good luck.
I hear you...
Thanks,
Roman.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 3:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-03 19:18 Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-10-05 15:35 ` sqweek
2008-10-06 3:46 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik [this message]
2008-10-06 4:56 ` sqweek
2008-10-06 16:31 ` Russ Cox
2008-10-07 3:47 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2008-10-07 7:48 ` sqweek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1223264804.6352.33.camel@goose.sun.com \
--to=rvs@sun.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).