From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:47:14 -0800
From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
In-reply-to: <112020081755.2769.4925A49000066BD800000AD122230682229B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9B9D0E9A9B9C040D@att.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-id: <1227206834.8918.2.camel@goose.sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <112020081755.2769.4925A49000066BD800000AD122230682229B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9B9D0E9A9B9C040D@att.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 != Inferno... right?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4c1f4554-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, 2008-11-20 at 17:55 +0000, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
> That's partly because there's a separate Inferno list.  And
> you're right that they're not the same, but are closely
> related.  The original Inferno kernel was based on (and
> used code from, I think) the Plan 9 kernel that was current
> at the time.

Speaking of which, is Styx just a different name for 9P2000 or
are there still some little differences?

Thanks,
Roman.