From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue,  2 Dec 2008 13:17:21 -0800
From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
In-reply-to: <f4d8fa40812021205h5617e876s1815ba5548d04483@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-id: <1228252641.16585.44.camel@goose.sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <1FAD6133-18F8-444F-BD6E-795999DE3170@sun.com>
	<dd6fe68a0812010948w60686277g2bbf54da7078d2bb@mail.gmail.com>
	<1228155909.18951.33.camel@goose.sun.com>
	<dd6fe68a0812011655u53e37741lca3a1d7c764ef3a1@mail.gmail.com>
	<1228241097.7593.40.camel@goose.sun.com>
	<20081202183153.GW3331@masters10.cs.jhu.edu>
	<1228246473.16585.27.camel@goose.sun.com>
	<f4d8fa40812021205h5617e876s1815ba5548d04483@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] How to implement a moral equivalent of automounter
	in	Plan9?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 55f7e144-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:05 +0100, hiro wrote:
> I still don't understand what kind of feature you are missing. Could
> it be that you just want a naming convention for your mount places?

Writable '#p/<id>/ns'

Thanks,
Roman.

P.S. Unless somebody tells me that it is a bad idea with the explanation
to back that claim up.