From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Thu,  8 Jan 2009 15:30:55 -0800
From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
In-reply-to: <94fd010cc7b6b876b4fb7da01f109fd0@quanstro.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-id: <1231457455.6916.75.camel@goose.sun.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
References: <94fd010cc7b6b876b4fb7da01f109fd0@quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] directly opening Plan9 devices
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7daeda76-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 09:17 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> i think we can skip the sematic arguments and the questions
> about rooting.  let's go directly to how would you unify
> the big-n Namespace in a way that's clearly better?

At this point: I don't know. :-( The discussion was tremendously
useful for me, though. I can only hope it was also moderately
entertaining for the rest of the list.

Thanks,
Roman.