From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:50:48 -0800 From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" In-reply-to: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-id: <1233096648.22808.334.camel@goose.sun.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <1233094356.22808.295.camel@goose.sun.com> <1233095462.22808.318.camel@goose.sun.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] Small program "PlanKey" (paraphrase of DOSKey) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8adacaac-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 14:43 -0800, Christopher Nielsen wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 14:31, Roman V. Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 14:25 -0800, Christopher Nielsen wrote: > >> > ... I've seen this study and I tend to believe it. But there's a gotcha: > >> > the kind of work that I and other software engineers do with computers > >> > is almost orthogonal to what the study was focusing on. I don't believe > >> > anybody else, but engineers, spend the majority of time dealing with > >> > text. > >> > >> Who do you think Plan 9 was designed for and by? > > > > For researches by researches. You have a different explanation? > > By programmers for programmers. Are you a programmer? Care to give pointers to the projects you've been on? > No need to reply. This is my last post on the subject. I get it! You are not a programmer -- you are a phone prankster. Thanks, Roman.