From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] source browsing via http is back
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:17:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234304244.4957.158.camel@goose.sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090210221303.GN22259@masters6.cs.jhu.edu>
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 17:13 -0500, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 01:51:47PM -0800, Roman V. Shaposhnik wrote:
> > since replica requires some (albeit automatic) periodic work on the
> > server end it means that there's one more thing for bell lab folks
> > to care about and maintain. that said, a brand new Venti proxy or
> > what not will probably be even worse for them :-(
>
> Under the proposed scheme, clients and maybe mirrors, not sources, run the
> new proxy. Sources runs only a venti and venti/ro, unmodified, to allow
> clients and mirrors to fetch blocks, and auth/none vac. Is this unreasonable?
It would be completely reasonable (and I wager *less* work for bell labs
folks than keeping an eye on replica) if that venti was only hosting
blocks coming from sources. As far as I know that's not the case.
Thanks,
Roman.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-10 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-10 18:49 geoff
2009-02-10 19:02 ` Bruce Ellis
2009-02-10 21:10 ` John Barham
2009-02-10 21:15 ` ron minnich
2009-02-10 21:22 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-10 21:32 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-10 21:51 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-10 21:55 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-10 22:05 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-10 22:13 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-10 22:17 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik [this message]
2009-02-10 22:08 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-10 22:10 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-10 22:23 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-10 22:28 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-10 22:45 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-11 0:22 ` Bruce Ellis
2009-02-11 0:28 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-11 6:06 ` Bruce Ellis
2009-02-11 0:32 ` Akshat Kumar
2009-02-11 1:43 ` [9fans] Plan 9 source history (was: Re: source browsing via http is back) Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-11 3:40 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-11 18:07 ` Uriel
2009-02-11 18:19 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2009-02-11 18:35 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-11 18:46 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-12 15:10 ` Venkatesh Srinivas
2009-02-11 19:06 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-12 5:57 ` [9fans] source browsing via http is back sqweek
2009-02-12 12:49 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-12 13:10 ` Bruce Ellis
2009-02-12 16:19 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-02-12 16:28 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-12 16:42 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-12 16:50 ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-02-12 16:56 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2009-02-12 16:58 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-12 17:20 ` Bruce Ellis
2009-02-12 16:52 ` erik quanstrom
2009-02-10 22:27 ` Nathaniel W Filardo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1234304244.4957.158.camel@goose.sun.com \
--to=rvs@sun.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).