From: rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in disk/format
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 01:27:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <124619951e4fdbe0e6a2ba1dde590b2e@plan9.bell-labs.com> (raw)
> Here is the md5 checksum of my /bin/disk/format binary: hopefully it
> will be identical to what was on sources before your fix. (Is there
> a dump filesystem on sources that the rest of us can look at?)
Sources is a kfs, but I do have dump CDs. I'll see if I can
make them available on a separate tcp port.
> term% md5sum /bin/disk/format
> 73e3a9480e3c973097e95dfcfd015a85 /bin/disk/format
That's correct.
> Finally, just to rule out the possibility of a corrupt executable
> text cache on my machine, I copied /bin/disk/format to /tmp/format
> and ran the same example again using /tmp/format, with the same
> result.
>
> By the way, in your attempt to reproduce this problem did you use
> a system with a SCSI disk? Note that the behavior of opendisk()
No, just a zeroed file appropriately sized.
I don't think format actually cares about
the geometry. I don't have any SCSI disks handy.
> is different for IDE vs. SCSI disks, particularly how it guesses
> the disk geometry. In the past I submitted a bugfix to disk.c that
> would greatly increase the likelihood of SCSI geometry being correctly
> guessed, and I see my patch was ignored...
More likely just missed. Where is this patch?
> In fact, disk/format guessed the wrong geometry for my SCSI disk:
> the BIOS geometry is 255 heads and 63 sectors per track. But even
> if disk/format assumes the wrong geometry when it creates a DOS
> filesystem, dossrv should work just fine since dossrv uses linear
> addressing and so doesn't know or care about c/h/s geometry.
Right.
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-26 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-26 5:27 rsc [this message]
2002-05-26 6:01 ` Mike Haertel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-27 17:49 rsc
2002-05-27 8:32 nigel
2002-05-26 22:13 rsc
2002-05-27 6:31 ` Michael Baldwin
2002-05-26 6:19 rsc
2002-05-26 20:40 ` Mike Haertel
2002-05-26 5:22 Geoff Collyer
2002-05-26 4:13 rsc
2002-05-26 5:11 ` Mike Haertel
2002-05-26 3:01 Mike Haertel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=124619951e4fdbe0e6a2ba1dde590b2e@plan9.bell-labs.com \
--to=rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).