From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:43 -0700 From: Roman V Shaposhnik In-reply-to: <1c4292c096371244ca3fbb0dd18abfa1@vitanuova.com> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-id: <1249430203.479.16575.camel@work.SFBay.Sun.COM> References: <1c4292c096371244ca3fbb0dd18abfa1@vitanuova.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] ceph Topicbox-Message-UUID: 38999574-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 10:55 +0100, C H Forsyth wrote: > >they emphatically don't go for posix semantics... > > what are "posix semantics"? I'll bite: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/ [ anything else that would take an FD as an argument ] http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/ Thanks, Roman.