From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:01:38 -0700 From: Roman V Shaposhnik In-reply-to: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Message-id: <1249430498.479.16585.camel@work.SFBay.Sun.COM> References: Subject: Re: [9fans] ceph Topicbox-Message-UUID: 38a46c7e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:43 +0100, Steve Simon wrote: > > Well, with Linux, at least you have a benefit of a gazillions of FS > > clients being available either natively or via FUSE. > > Do you have a link to a site which lists interesting FUSE filesystems, > I am definitely not trying to troll, I am always intrigued by others > ideas of how to reprisent data/APIs as fs. I don't, and I probably should start documenting it. The easiest way to find them, though, is to be suscbribed to fuse ML and collect the domain names of posters. Turns out that anybody who's doing cloud storage these days does it via FUSE (which, might not be as surprising if you think about what's the dominant OS on EC2). You have companies ranging from startups: http://www.nirvanix.com/ all the way to tyrannosaurus' like EMC and IBM betting on FUSE to get them to storage in the cloud. Sadly, none of them are open source as far as I can tell. > Sadly the Fuse fs I have seen have mostly been disappointing.There are > a few I which would be handy on plan9 (gmail, ipod, svn) but most > seem less useful. The OS ones, are not all that impressive. I agree. Thanks, Roman.