From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:27:01 -0700
From: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" <rvs@sun.com>
In-reply-to: <6a3ae47e0908140127s34983c4bl6406c78c8c349e3b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Message-id: <1250274421.26729.89.camel@goose.sun.com>
References: <op.uyka0s1y0p3ku8@localhost>
	<680C3DA2-9DBC-4524-8F6E-31885F9E7446@storytotell.org>
	<1250218702.26729.69.camel@goose.sun.com>
	<6a3ae47e0908140127s34983c4bl6406c78c8c349e3b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [9fans] Lua on Plan9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4a262852-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 09:27 +0100, Robert Raschke wrote:

> Last time I tried, the standard Lua compiled out of the box under the
> APE.

That is good to know. Still, I'd rather see it run without APE.

> Great little language. I use it in my day job (together with Erlang).

*together* with Erlang?!?! That I have to know more about. Perhaps
off-list.

>  It's implementation is indeed just as enlightening as the Plan 9
> code. An exercise in doing exactly what is required and no more. Very
> elegant in my eyes.

Couldn't agree more!

Thanks,
Roman.