From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <1255.199.98.17.57.1064851357.squirrel@wish>
In-Reply-To: <3F784A92.84FDE48B@null.net>
References: <ejKdnUgMFtxCTOuiXTWJkQ@comcast.com>,
      <ec0a9fbc1ea1ff7fca55c482a1c873e9@caldo.demon.co.uk>
     <3F784A92.84FDE48B@null.net>
Subject: Re: SPAM: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have
     limits
From: "Joel Salomon" <salomo3@cooper.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:02:37 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 559faa54-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I would prefer to see development of a social climate in which
> it is so universally acknowledged that such attacks are not
> acceptable that ordinary people take steps to stop it when they
> detect it, instead of delegating the problem to government
> agents.
>
Boyd, you may fire when ready.

--Joel