From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <126a2f7d0609260321n45d44450xb1b9ee0208ddc749@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 15:21:02 +0500 From: "Sergey Zhilkin" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [9fans] linux il/ip In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3864_19171302.1159266062568" References: Topicbox-Message-UUID: c1b52b2e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 ------=_Part_3864_19171302.1159266062568 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Maybe /sys/src/cmd/unix/9pfreebsd will be good startpoint ? 2006/9/26, erik quanstrom : > > from what i can tell, SCTP combines the limitations of il with the > complexity of tcp. > i think porting il to linux would be more useful. > > - erik > > On Mon Sep 25 18:18:00 CDT 2006, cnielsen@pobox.com wrote: > > On 9/1/06, David Leimbach wrote: > > > SCTP could be interesting to add to Plan 9. Would it require DARPA > > > funding or an NSF grant? :-) > > > > haven't had internet access in a while, so i am just getting around to > > responding to this. > > > > i started an SCTP implementation a while back; it looked like an > > interesting protocol. i didn't get too far before i gave up. the > > complexity of the protocol gave me the willies. > > > > i am considering going back to what i started, but currently, i think > > my limited coding time will be better spent elsewhere. we'll see. > ------=_Part_3864_19171302.1159266062568 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Maybe /sys/src/cmd/unix/9pfreebsd will be good startpoint ?

2006/9/26, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>:
from what i can tell, SCTP combines the limitations of il with the complexity of tcp.
i think porting il to linux would be more useful.

- erik

On Mon Sep 25 18:18:00 CDT 2006, cnielsen@pobox.com wrote:
> On 9/1/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> > SCTP could be interesting to add to Plan 9.  Would it require DARPA
> > funding or an NSF grant? :-)
>
> haven't had internet access in a while, so i am just getting around to
> responding to this.
>
> i started an SCTP implementation a while back; it looked like an
> interesting protocol. i didn't get too far before i gave up. the
> complexity of the protocol gave me the willies.
>
> i am considering going back to what i started, but currently, i think
> my limited coding time will be better spent elsewhere. we'll see.

------=_Part_3864_19171302.1159266062568--