From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <1299050575.19698.1425299789@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: "Ethan Grammatikidis" <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
References: <AANLkTi=JkUoRaK30rhSjKxbo0eU9varQqo7+pZhC4kVR@mail.gmail.com><aee7eddc38096802e0b4b3783e233c85@terzarima.net>
	<AANLkTimhsAxTC-Un-Vdj68f8zuEv4C8KUg5LoMHcOFwu@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimhsAxTC-Un-Vdj68f8zuEv4C8KUg5LoMHcOFwu@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  2 Mar 2011 07:22:55 +0000
Subject: Re: [9fans] 8l follows a precedence based on the commandline
 arrangement
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b674c788-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 08:41 -0800, "Rob Pike" <robpike@gmail.com> wrote:
> someone should move those pages and all links from 2 to 8.

There's no problem accessing any ?l page with man(1), unless it's grown
a bug since I last pulled. I assume the problem is with web man indexes?
If so, shouldn't the indexing be fixed? I mean if we move them all to 8,
what about 5l or vl?