From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <129e77e6390963389805d685b070a434@akira.nop.cx> To: 9fans@9fans.net From: Tim Wiess Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:39:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] MIPS-64 Topicbox-Message-UUID: bf5300b0-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Yes I started on working the toolchain a couple years ago, based on some earlier work done at the labs. Development stalled due to other work at the time and I never got back to it. But it's on sources (tim/4acl.tgz) if anybody wants to pick it up. I'm happy to provide any help. tim > tim weiss started work on kencc mips64 port and I started (w/o the > compiler) playing with Plan 9 on mips64 based on the old carrera port. > > the stupid initial code is at http://src.oitobits.net/9sgi > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:24 PM, ron minnich wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Anthony Sorace wrote: >>> i was looking at this a week or two ago, trying to find an ARM or MIPS >>> laptop to play with. my first question was whether the "missing" parts >>> of the MIPS instruction set are things that our compilers currently >>> generate; SoC (oh, and my day job) ramped up before i could find the >>> list of missing instructions. any idea? >>> >>> getting quotes or delivery in the US seemed tricky, too. >> >> so, here's a silghtly controversial (maybe) suggestion. Maybe my >> memory is wrong, but i believe the vx32 kernel is gcc-compiled. There >> is gcc for this CPU. It might be easier to start from the vx32 kernel >> and gcc to target this machine, rather than do a 64-bit MIPS port of >> the plan 9 C compiler. Or not: a few of the folks on this list could >> probably retarget in very short order (I'm not one of the,however). >> >> ron >> >> > > > > -- > iru