From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <12ff5c604eb9a4d19d3ca176384ac632@caldo.demon.co.uk> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] IMAP clients and plan9 imap server From: Charles Forsyth In-Reply-To: <200310051756.h95HuUj18681@augusta.math.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-kokuusiyqgdufbrdgopfxieooi" Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:51:00 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 60a58338-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-kokuusiyqgdufbrdgopfxieooi Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i just use netstat (on each separate interface as required). i believe it finds all the ports and that way at least i surprise myself! --upas-kokuusiyqgdufbrdgopfxieooi Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu> Received: from punt-3.mail.demon.net by mailstore for forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk id 1A6D8M-0000mB-6N; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:57:31 +0000 Received: from [130.203.4.6] (helo=mail.cse.psu.edu) by punt-3.mail.demon.net with esmtp id 1A6D8M-0000mB-6N for forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk; Sun, 05 Oct 2003 17:57:31 +0000 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 3960A19AC5; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:57:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id DD25519B8A; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:57:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 6BD8F19ABA; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:56:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from math.psu.edu (leibniz.math.psu.edu [146.186.130.2]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id B9D9519B62 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:56:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from augusta.math.psu.edu (augusta.math.psu.edu [146.186.132.2]) by math.psu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA08435 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:56:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from augusta.math.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by augusta.math.psu.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h95HuUj18681 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sun, 5 Oct 2003 13:56:30 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200310051756.h95HuUj18681@augusta.math.psu.edu> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] IMAP clients and plan9 imap server In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 Oct 2003 12:03:40 EDT." From: Dan Cross Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 13:56:30 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) David Presotto writes: > > nmap does an incredibly bad job identifying whats behind plan 9 ports > because we're not worth their time to know about. At least it finds > the open ports, even though we often have different services there > than others do. I don't know about that; if Matthias's list was complete, nmap missed about four open ports I have running pure Plan 9 services (rexexec, cpu, etc). However, he did show me that I had a pop3 running that I didn't want (which I've now turned off. Thanks, Matthias!). Then again, I don't suppose nmap scans every possible port i in Z_65536. - Dan C. --upas-kokuusiyqgdufbrdgopfxieooi--