From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <130aaf746f04e48e1c80401003d66979@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Webbrowser
From: Peter Bosch <pb@research.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <77460E19-396D-11D7-8519-000A27AE643E@sockfarm.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed,  5 Feb 2003 21:13:03 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5039cb36-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I know. I have actually thought about attempting to port the
> khtml library to Plan 9, but I guess I'm prejudiced against
> C++, (and gcc). I don't mean to offend anyone.
>
> I agree that khtml is far preferable to Mozilla. It just
> seemed a step toward Mozilla/X11 chaos and bloatedness, and
> away from the grace of Plan 9.

g++ can be used on Plan 9.

pb.