From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <13426df10705282321o5721fe8dh880e795b06a0dc1c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 23:21:24 -0700 From: "ron minnich" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] I'm puzzled In-Reply-To: <14ec7b180705282251o1c33488fg840a9a9fac54dfb3@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <13426df10705282113iec0fa05hcf85679888b9a12d@mail.gmail.com> <5429cae9062c140902d55e19059873bf@plan9.bell-labs.com> <14ec7b180705282251o1c33488fg840a9a9fac54dfb3@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 742348c2-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 5/28/07, andrey mirtchovski wrote: > how does that deal with the "never" expiring accounts, don't they have > zero as the expiry date? > > On 5/28/07, geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: > > I've just pushed out a new auth/secstore/password.c that has better > > error messages and only believes non-zero expiry times. > > > > > BTW, the auth/enable did not work at all. I am running, right now, with a hacked secstored (well, password.c is hacked with an 'expired, like I care' print to fd 2) that ignores the expired error. I have no idea what's wrong here. I just know how to work around it. thanks ron