From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10706241734m3cb0edc6xbaa217ceb15c9b3c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 17:34:45 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P optimization
In-Reply-To: <20070624062929.E1471@orthanc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c9581c30b17957fb7a0e819d5343af96@quintile.net>
	<20070624062929.E1471@orthanc.ca>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 869ad998-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 6/24/07, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:

> 9P wouldn't need any mods -- this would work easily as a filter pushed on
> the 9fs connection.  But it would need a callback facility to notify the
> server side of the cache filter that the file had changed.

callback? Couldn't you just post a read on a file in the server and
have a thread hang on that?

ron