From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10707060754j553a6a70v4d50633d3afe2917@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  6 Jul 2007 07:54:25 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] implementing 9p read
In-Reply-To: <93f71afb320e8cd61cd2ff3f9f08ebbe@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <468D8253.9030400@wmipf.in-berlin.de>
	<93f71afb320e8cd61cd2ff3f9f08ebbe@quintile.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 91f11870-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 7/6/07, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:

> You cannot do this, the usual idiom is that if read returns less
> than the app expected this is treated as EOF.

Oh not, that's not at all true. Any program that behaves this way is
broken. Unless I totally misunderstand your point.

ron