From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9P vs. FUSE
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 12:21:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13426df10708101221t3f220982ufe292993b629e4ad@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920708101216y225ca5e5oa06270d90e6d4271@mail.gmail.com>
On 8/10/07, Uriel <uriel99@gmail.com> wrote:
> In any case, it would be nice if people considering changes to the
> protocol could be a bit more open about it so we could have some
> discussion about how much sense it makes, and we could avoid a repeat
> of the waste of time and effort with .u.
A negative result is still useful. It makes no sense to characterize
.u this way (and I'm one of the guys who never liked it).
We learned something of value. We have the code base and experience.
That's what research is.
Openness? We were very open to people who actually contributed code.
ron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-10 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 11:42 Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 11:57 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-08-10 12:19 ` Iruata Souza
[not found] ` <2d66a95ea087868174cfdc519a48a2d7@9netics.com>
2007-08-10 12:33 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 12:36 ` erik quanstrom
2007-08-10 12:42 ` Lucio De Re
[not found] ` <22bce9d3afa44ed70b739ea77d5d8046@quanstro.net>
2007-08-10 12:48 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 13:18 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] ` <f17c25af999bb93211e069e6109bb154@quanstro.net>
2007-08-10 13:36 ` Enrico Weigelt
2007-08-10 13:42 ` andrey mirtchovski
2007-08-10 13:44 ` erik quanstrom
2007-08-10 13:45 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 15:51 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 16:32 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2007-08-10 16:39 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 18:16 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 18:25 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2007-08-10 18:35 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 19:16 ` Uriel
2007-08-10 19:21 ` ron minnich [this message]
2007-08-10 19:29 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-08-10 21:57 ` ron minnich
2007-08-10 19:29 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2007-08-10 19:32 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2007-08-10 19:02 ` Uriel
2007-08-10 19:21 ` Charles Forsyth
2007-08-10 19:26 ` erik quanstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13426df10708101221t3f220982ufe292993b629e4ad@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rminnich@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).