From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10709071545i376e9e09s2a464f88d0fffa19@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri,  7 Sep 2007 15:45:00 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 1/2 OT: per-process mounts/namespace @ Linux
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60709071426mf4a4ea2kfdb4500fe763b0a9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20070907200915.GA20929@nibiru.local>
	<a4e6962a0709071315j2e578c02m6be1f55d2b779e5c@mail.gmail.com>
	<3e1162e60709071426mf4a4ea2kfdb4500fe763b0a9@mail.gmail.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bb36a10a-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/7/07, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:

> Then you have to worry about what happens when people do things like binding
> over /etc/passwd :-)

See all my old stuff from 2.0.36

rules: you can only make a private name space in /private
and, by definition, no special inode bits -- which was a feature to
me, I was ambivalent on the .u extensions.

I think that made it impossible to fake out the usual stuff.

ron