From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <13426df10710161126k6ba9427wdb88c12de3f7914b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:26:12 -0700 From: "ron minnich" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] I appear to have stumped the brains at chacha.com In-Reply-To: <0669e049cdcabfcf19a270d184d94fe1@quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <14ec7b180710161105m4111eb2gb25d0efaaeda0056@mail.gmail.com> <0669e049cdcabfcf19a270d184d94fe1@quanstro.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: d1fb582c-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 btw, speaking of orders of magnitude: big cluster in 1990: 4 nodes big cluster in 2005: 4096 nodes big "supercomputer" in 1992: 256 CPUs big "supercomputer" in 2008: 256K CPUs so, 10 bits in about 15 years in each case. You can fill in the data points, and project and look at what people are doing and, guess what, no sign it will stop. There's a cheat here: that big "supercomputer" is multicore, but still ... These aren't Google systems. These are systems that are "tightly coupled", i.e. run one app and only run as fast as the slowest computer and the longest network latency will allow. Network latency is measured in units of hundreds of nanoseconds. At any given time, there's only one or two of these being built (that we know about). ron