From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <13426df10711121101p7f1677a2qcd4dc4f18222117d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:01:10 -0800 From: "ron minnich" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Ruby port In-Reply-To: <1194881471.644286.128190@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <13426df10711112128g3da54d0au6bff4ddcfa76234b@mail.gmail.com> <1194881471.644286.128190@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: f40ab502-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Nov 12, 2007 7:40 AM, prem wrote: > At least it needs c++ compiler to compile. This could be possible with > ported gcc/g++. but LLVM site quote many versions of gcc miscompiling > LLVM > It is nice to see gcc 4.x in the gcc for plan9 ( my guess it doesn't > exists and nobody is bothered to do it ). It would be really nice to > see LLVM on Plan9 Fact is gcc is a de-facto standard, and you either have it, and can run stuff like LLVM, or you don't. that's life. ron