From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10803010840r246fc8aej3b3690b8e8b05f05@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat,  1 Mar 2008 08:40:33 -0800
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing
In-Reply-To: <8E9AFD07-4AA0-4DCA-8D1A-75C9D2AF6BAA@orthanc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <df122de4adc50d9cf99138a6f8e566d9@proxima.alt.za>
	<a4e6962a0802292202o48b116e9p1299fa4c2d93a296@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAC8066C-3BA4-47EB-AB00-B8237AAC97DF@orthanc.ca>
	<13426df10802292311s39aaf430j5cb98223a51fba25@mail.gmail.com>
	<8E9AFD07-4AA0-4DCA-8D1A-75C9D2AF6BAA@orthanc.ca>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6b226644-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:
>
>  On 2008-Feb-29, at 23:11 , ron minnich wrote:
>
>  >> But none of this code will "just work" on Plan 9 (especially the
>  >> Fortran code), so what's the point?
>  >
>  > Why do you say that?
>
>  The lack of a F95 compiler in /bin?  (If you have one in house, that's
>  cheating.)
>

The comment was "especially the Fortran code", but also saying "none
of this code".

So my question stands: why is it that *none* of this code would work?

ron