From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10803180952w3f0d73c2ga1ffa808ddc44de1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:52:41 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <d1c554290803180926i3b7bf207j5782d6ac1db34f51@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <625ffb369a67f436b007df6ae899ac06@9netics.com>
	<d1c554290803180926i3b7bf207j5782d6ac1db34f51@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] It looks like our GSoC application was rejected
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7b726b3e-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Iruata Souza <iru.muzgo@gmail.com> wrote:

>  last year's big problem was the number of failed projects, not the
>  effort made by the organization.

I am going to assume you know this because you know the % of failed
projects for Plan 9, you know the % failed for all other projects, and
you know that all other projects had a lower % failed than Plan 9, and
all these were renewed? Or, better, someone at Google told you?

Otherwise, if this is idle speculation, we've got the Venti thread for
that one :-)

ron