From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10803211155y4aed19cfw926f53fcea80c9ba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 11:55:34 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <f14244541b45e7feab7871f72e8acb94@coraid.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <62e5b9b85412a0192f54a1a54a0f638d@csplan9.rit.edu>
	<f14244541b45e7feab7871f72e8acb94@coraid.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9bench: lmbench for Plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7db2ca06-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:51 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
> > As I note in the README, lmbench's license carries the additional
>  > restriction that you cannot publish results from modified benchmarks,
>  > so keep your results to yourself.
>
>  doesn't generating unpublishable results defeat the purpose of a benchmark?

what is the purpose?

ron