From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10806160824s521cd326vc27c533e641044bf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:24:42 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: weigelt@metux.de, "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080615235831.GB12962@nibiru.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080614130357.GA25092@nibiru.local>
	<20080614175003.4DA171E8C3A@holo.morphisms.net>
	<20080615160235.GA19951@nibiru.local>
	<28E627FF-EA71-4F0A-8146-AE73CC1C337C@mac.com>
	<20080615171353.GB19951@nibiru.local>
	<8FAA9E51-3331-4294-8804-21D46EB934BA@mac.com>
	<20080615235831.GB12962@nibiru.local>
Subject: Re: [9fans] command line tool for storing / reading files on venti
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c10c9926-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de> wrote:
> * Pietro Gagliardi <pietro10@mac.com> wrote:
>> Doesn't matter. Process groups are process groups on any Unix clone.
>> If it's daemons you're dealing with, then it leaves the scope of this
>> room. If it's Windows, you're out of luck.
>
> I'm running p9p on Linux. No idea where the actual problem sits,
> but your example left the vacfs-processes running.
>

yes but I don't understand why your response to what you think is a
problem is to write more code instead of figuring out what's going on.

I realize that's the current open source culture, but I don't know why.

ron