From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10806270904y183e6af5o745aaa3134130565@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:04:40 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <14ec7b180806270856k7e80e129g4b9973076b12bb57@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <14ec7b180806270816t389b0794i1654ae3b6ed2a46d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20080627152937.4DA6A1E8C2B@holo.morphisms.net>
	<3e1162e60806270839x1e0550b0nef671c73df91fff4@mail.gmail.com>
	<14ec7b180806270856k7e80e129g4b9973076b12bb57@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx - os x fix
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c8a5126c-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:56 AM, andrey mirtchovski
<mirtchovski@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is it supposed to run at full-load? Both cores are fully utilized and
> 9vx.OSX uses 187% of the cpu at all times. dtruss reports that the
> main thread is just sitting there doing "select_nocancel(0x0,0x0,0x0)"
> with timeouts.


is that hlt() :-)

ron