From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10807061020o494907cbnd48a9fc303e056fd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  6 Jul 2008 10:20:31 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <8db7f9a1866d1cd5c07eca58a04f7d35@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8db7f9a1866d1cd5c07eca58a04f7d35@quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx dns funny
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dc04ec2e-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 8:56 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:

> personally, i feel it would be more useful to be
> able to use plan 9's native network stack.  but
> i'm biased.  i want to send aoe/cec/il packets.
>

Part of the reason I have not stopped using lguest, although now I use
both 9vx and lguest.

You could write a plan 9 device for vx that drives raw frames to linux
I suppose.

ron