From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10807080933u21d3b562ud3f6626346b999cd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  8 Jul 2008 09:33:13 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <e5af0901972596525e14b0067d3bc305@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3e1162e60807080858o499bc3c4l514056f090751e4@mail.gmail.com>
	<e5af0901972596525e14b0067d3bc305@quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: dea74aee-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:04 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:

> if that's the argument, wouldn't it make sense to get
> rid of plan 9?
>


Think of 9vx and lguest and friends as "software tools". "Software
tools" did a lot to popularize the ideas of Unix, and made it easier
for people to consider using the real thing.

ron