From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10807170706n2ba5e1fayde9f97e2c72b891b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:06:40 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <2ed6d1cabb3ba37d0a19973cab2f8905@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <13426df10807170558g2782802n7039faf142c221b7@mail.gmail.com>
	<2ed6d1cabb3ba37d0a19973cab2f8905@quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 8 cores
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ea8dcbda-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:46 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> But you make trips through the vm code on read/write in any event,
>> don't you? There was a pretty good paper comparing these paths once
>> and in the end it boiled down to "your cost will vary depending on how
>> you wrote the kernel" :-)
>
> on plan 9?  where?

I can't remember ...

ron