From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <13426df10807301042s2e40d18bx8ace6ac25829e610@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:42:41 -0700 From: "ron minnich" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <48909277.2010602@mtu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <488B6EE7.3080100@mtu.edu> <1217421120.5036.34.camel@goose.sun.com> <13426df10807300810s4d854612ib7597a9463f7f02f@mail.gmail.com> <48908707.1070005@mtu.edu> <13426df10807300841y1e4bed36l7a009c8873f39c1b@mail.gmail.com> <48909277.2010602@mtu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 on Blue Gene Topicbox-Message-UUID: f6bff3ec-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Steven D. Vormwald wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong here, but don't these require extensive run-time > support, in addition to compiler support? Will the run-time libraries also > be linux libraries running under a compatibility layer? binaries on the bg/l machine are static. The compatibilty is needed in two places: system call layer, and allowing CNK binaries direct access to network hardware. ron