From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10807311515u12c7dc92u9030976d2b21b7e9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:15:07 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <545f39b0db6de3c012ff4a9daec36b43@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <13426df10807311502o2bf0033ne3622512757427d9@mail.gmail.com>
	<545f39b0db6de3c012ff4a9daec36b43@quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] a question on style
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f959f490-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:04 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> OK, am I just out of date or is there a real reason for linker
>> sets?This question just came up in linuxbios v3 and I am wondering if
>> I am a stubborn old coot (likely) or if there really is merit to my
>> dislike of linker sets.
>
> why can't both be true?
>

I suspect both are true ...

ron