From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10807311519g63c8e1acq491f43b83cfee2c1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:19:18 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "erik quanstrom" <quanstro@quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <af2f03a68f1be3c97a367093315a9f56@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <af2f03a68f1be3c97a367093315a9f56@quanstro.net>
Cc: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] a question on style
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f96c3d76-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 3:17 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> >> OK, am I just out of date or is there a real reason for linker
>> >> sets?This question just came up in linuxbios v3 and I am wondering if
>> >> I am a stubborn old coot (likely) or if there really is merit to my
>> >> dislike of linker sets.
>> >
>> > why can't both be true?
>> >
>>
>> I suspect both are true ...
>
> would i be rude to agree with you?
>

I have kids. Trust me, you're not being rude.

ron