From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <13426df10808250752q6eef737du1791bd13a740d36@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:52:37 -0700
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <13426df10808250752o475c689fr4306be6f865079be@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080825110330.10b075c6@dazone>
	<03694148c5c6c547f42b236ff8e57618@quanstro.net>
	<13426df10808250752o475c689fr4306be6f865079be@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] lguest on 2.6.25
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 075cd30a-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 7:52 AM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:56 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I have gotten the lguest port working on the 2.6.25.0 kernel, it works mighty fine here.
>>> The load issue for me is only on plan9, on the host I can see with 'top' that the lguest guest isn't consuming all the cpu, so this might ust be a plan9 problem. I have also seen quite a few messages in /sys/log/cron i get a lot of lines saying:
>>> $sysname Aug 25 08:31:14 time went backward
>>
>> both the excessive load and these messages sound like a timesync problem.
>>
>
> yeah, that's really weird. One option is to set up the kernels without

by 'kernel' here I mean linux kernel, sorry.

ron