9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ron minnich" <rminnich@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] image/memimage speed
Date: Thu,  4 Dec 2008 22:39:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13426df10812042239pde2100dw696049def0160c4a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7607005a544d6ca43080fadffc99d8f5@coraid.com>

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:33 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
>>
>> Very true, the only exception to this I know of is some of the modern
>> Dual PCIExpress cards which use a bus in each direction.
>>
>
> do you have a reference for "dual pciexpress"?  as far as i know,
> pcie/agp/pci cards only have a single bus that goes both ways.

how about this:
"SANTA CLARA, CA—JUNE 28, 2004—NVIDIA Corporation (Nasdaq: NVDA), the
worldwide leader in visual processing solutions, broadened its already
expansive graphics line today with the introduction of four new NVIDIA
Quadro(R) professional graphics solutions based on PCI Express™.
Leveraging this next-generation bus architecture, NVIDIA doubles the
bandwidth of its AGP 8X-based products to over 4GB per second in both
upstream and downstream data transfers.  "

I think the AGP assymetry is long gone. Back when I was at LANL the
graphics guys were telling me that read bandwidth was no longer an
issue with the new pcie cards.

If you're still seeing bad performance it may be because you need to
fix up the MTRR or GART settings. I've done this dance and have no
memory at this point of what you do, but vague memory is that proper
MTRR settings with a good PCIe card will give you far better bandwidth
than the old AGP cards. There is nothing like the 60x assymetry.

ron



  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-05  6:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-30 22:00 Iruata Souza
2008-11-30 23:54 ` Iruata Souza
2008-12-01  1:29   ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-01  1:54     ` andrey mirtchovski
2008-12-01  2:35       ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-01  3:30         ` andrey mirtchovski
2008-12-01  6:41         ` Paul Lalonde
2008-12-01 14:19     ` Steve Simon
2008-12-01 14:33       ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-05  6:39         ` ron minnich [this message]
2008-12-05 13:35           ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-05 18:27             ` Russ Cox
2008-12-05 18:32               ` Russ Cox
2008-12-05 18:49                 ` ron minnich
2008-12-05 19:21                   ` Paul Lalonde
2008-12-05 19:25                     ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-05 19:30                       ` Paul Lalonde
2008-12-05 19:40                         ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-05 20:11                         ` ron minnich
2008-12-06  5:52                           ` Paul Lalonde
2008-12-07 17:00               ` Aki Nyrhinen
2008-12-07 23:22                 ` erik quanstrom
2008-12-08  0:17                   ` Aki Nyrhinen
2008-12-01 15:24 plalonde
2008-12-05  5:22 ` sqweek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13426df10812042239pde2100dw696049def0160c4a@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rminnich@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).